TemporaryFile vs NamedTemporaryFile Delete Modes Lab

Intro — what this post promises

Need a scratch file? TemporaryFile, NamedTemporaryFile(delete=...), and mkstemp are not the same syscall story. One is often already anonymous; another keeps a visible path; fsync turns a cheap unlink into a barrier.

This is a hands-on lab with measured numbers:

1. Create → write (~400 B) → read/flush → close for several tempfile APIs.
2. NamedTemporaryFile(delete=True) vs delete=False + manual unlink.
3. mkstemp unlink-while-open vs close-then-unlink (± fsync).

Related links:

• 01shoppercove.comatomic rename vs overwrite localhost lab
• 02shoppercove.comfsync vs fdatasync localhost lab
• 03shoppercove.compipe vs tmpfile IPC localhost lab
• 04shoppercove.composix fadvise sequential vs random localhost lab
• 05shoppercove.comWhy your average latency graph is lying (p50 / p95 / p99)

Lab honesty (1 Oct 2026 IST): Python 3.13.5; dir under /tmp overlay. Affiliates: 0.

Verdict up front: TemporaryFile ~41100 ops/s; NamedTemporaryFile ~19600 (~0.48×). mkstemp+fsync+unlink ~3600; without fsync ~32k.

APIs compared

Related links:

• 01shoppercove.comfsync vs fdatasync localhost lab

Lab topology

/tmp workdir · ~400 B payload · n=1000 ops/batch · 5 repeats
Timed region includes create/write/close (+unlink as specified)

Script: lab-evidence/45-tempfile-modes/results/run_lab.py.

Lead table (p50)

Payload spot checks (NamedTemporaryFile delete=True): 64 B ~20835/s; 64 KiB ~14979/s.

Related links:

• 01shoppercove.comWhy your average latency graph is lying (p50 / p95 / p99)
• 02shoppercove.comatomic rename vs overwrite localhost lab

How to read these numbers

• No path needed → TemporaryFile (fastest convenient API here).
• Need a name for a subprocess → NamedTemporaryFile (~2× slower) or mkstemp.
• delete=True vs False+unlink ≈ same cost.
• fsync on temps is a durability product decision — huge cliff.

Pitfalls we hit (or avoided)

1. Putting fsync in the “default mkstemp” arm — rebenchmarked without it (~32k vs ~3.6k).
2. Assuming NamedTemporaryFile ≈ TemporaryFile — ~0.48×.
3. Leaking delete=False files — always unlink or use a context that does.
4. Cross-device temps for atomic replace — see atomic-rename lab.
5. Measuring only create without write/close — we included a small write.

Practical checklist

• Scratch buffers: TemporaryFile or SpooledTemporaryFile.
• External tools needing a path: NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False) + try/finally unlink, or mkstemp.
• Don’t fsync temps unless the durability contract says so.
• Prefer same filesystem as the final os.replace target.
• Clean up crash leftovers for delete=False.

Related links:

• 01shoppercove.compipe vs tmpfile IPC localhost lab
• 02shoppercove.composix fadvise sequential vs random localhost lab
• 03shoppercove.comSQLite WAL vs DELETE journal localhost lab
• 04shoppercove.comjson vs orjson vs msgpack localhost lab

Methodology footnote

Each op writes a fixed payload, flushes, and closes. NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False) unlinks after close inside the timed op. The fsync mkstemp arm calls os.fsync(fd) before close. Leftover files from the “leave file” arm are unlinked outside the timed window.

Versions / environment

• Python 3.13.5 tempfile / os
• Workdir under /tmp on overlay lab VM

Anonymous temps are the speed default; named temps buy a path for about half the throughput here.

delete=True vs delete=False

Throughput nearly matched (~19.6k vs ~20.2k). The product difference is failure mode: delete=False survives across process crashes until something unlinks the path — useful for debugging postmortems, dangerous for /tmp fill-ups. Prefer delete=True unless a child process must reopen by name after you close (then pass the name carefully and unlink in a finally).

Relationship to atomic replace

Named temps often feed os.replace into a config path (atomic-rename lab). Create the named temp in the destination directory so replace stays same-FS atomic. Using TemporaryFile cannot supply that path; that is the feature trade, not a bug.

Ratio cheatsheet (vs TemporaryFile)

NamedTemporaryFile delete=True 0.48× · delete=False+unlink 0.49× · mkstemp unlink-while-open 0.77× · mkstemp close+unlink no fsync 0.79× · mkstemp+fsync ~0.09×

If a profile shows temp creation hot, switching Named→Temporary (when safe) is a plausible 2×; adding fsync is how you accidentally get a 10× regression.

On busy shared /tmp, also watch inode limits and sticky-bit permissions — throughput numbers assume a quiet lab workdir.

SpooledTemporaryFile (not timed, but related)

For small blobs that might grow, SpooledTemporaryFile keeps bytes in RAM until a size threshold, then rolls to disk. That path can beat any of today’s disk arms for sub-threshold sizes — and looks nothing like NamedTemporaryFile in profiles. If your “temp file” is usually under a few KiB, consider spooling before paying named-path costs.

Security / predictability notes

Named temps use predictable directory listings if permissions are wrong. Keep dir= on a private directory when secrets touch disk. TemporaryFile’s anonymous POSIX pattern reduces the rename/race window because there is often no lasting directory entry — another reason it is the default scratch tool.

Capacity planning example

At ~20k NamedTemporaryFile ops/s, one core could theoretically open ~20 million named temps per second in a microbench — reality will be lock contention on the directory and page cache. Still, if a job creates 100k temps, budget ~5 s of create/close overhead from this lab’s µs/op before counting useful work. TemporaryFile would be ~2.4 s for the same count on these numbers.

Verdict

TemporaryFile (~41k ops/s) beat NamedTemporaryFile (~20k, ~0.48×) for small write/close cycles. mkstemp without fsync sat ~32k; with fsync ~3.6k. Pick anonymous when you can; pay for names deliberately; fsync only with a durability story.

Evidence: lab-evidence/45-tempfile-modes/results/. Affiliates: 0.